September 26, 2003
Falling down
Salon: We were both professionals. Now I'm sweeping up popcorn, my husband is selling motorcycles, and our house is on the block. There are a lot of us these days.
September 25, 2003
Today's presidential debate
Watching the Democrats' presidential debate tonight on MSNBC (TiVo'd, of course, so I can fast-forward through Kucinich and Graham). Quick impressions:
- The winner tonight seemed to be Gen. Wesley Clark, not because of any rhetorical flourish, but because he didn't stumble. In fact, he acquitted himself pretty well and seemed not out of place on the podium, despite being a politician for all of nine days.
- It seemed by far the best showing for the two Johns, Edwards and Kerry. It may be too late for Edwards, but Kerry's still showing some life. His attacks on Dean seemed a little shrill, though, as both of them are positioning to become two of the last men standing in late January (Clark vs. Kerry or Clark vs. Dean).
- Dean seemed to be on the defensive most of the night. (And why has he forgotten to smile?) He's got to get off the "repeal all the Bush tax cuts" meme and get behind a tax cut or exemption for working families and the middle class. I don't see a national constituency coalescing behind a platform of tax hikes in favor of expanded health care and a balanced budget. He's also got to stop the somewhat elitist suggestion that $325 or $1,000 in taxes doesn't really matter to ordinary Americans. Yes, their property taxes and school tuitions have gone up, but those higher taxes and fees aren't going away. The Dean brain trust needs to do some work.
- Brian Williams (probably my favorite network anchor, though he's invisible at MSNBC) proved a terrific moderator, with measured tones and timely humor. The journalists asking the questions were outstanding.
Here's some press coverage:
- Slate: It's the First Debate of the General Election. So, why are the Democrats ignoring Wesley Clark.
- Salon: Democratic rivals target Bush -- and Dean.
- Minneapolis Star Tribune: Clark makes debut with Democratic presidential opponents.
'Hollywood magic' for home video
I don't generally run press releases for new products, but I'm a big fan of multimedia software that encourages personal creativity. I think we'll see an explosion in home moviemaking over the next five years. So this may be a little ahead of the curve, but perhaps there's already a market for licensed soundtrack music for homemade film shorts and family videos.
Richard Manfredi, PR director for SmartSound Software, passes along word that this week SmartSound released five new music CDs in its Movie Music library. Says Richard:
These tracks are designed for use with SmartSound's Movie Maestro soundtrack creation software, and feature moods and styles that are a great fit for any home video creator who wants a Hollywood soundtrack for their projects. Movie Maestro is an ingenious software product that creates soundtracks that exactly fit any length of video footage, with the user needing to be a music expert.
'We Media' in html
Shayne Bowman over at Hypergene Media has formatted an HTML version of the New Directions for News report "We Media: How audiences are shaping the future of news and information." Previously it was available just in PDF form.
Dean declares war on King George
Salon has reprinted excerpts from Howard Dean's campaign speech at Copley Square in Boston on Tuesday: Dean declares war on "King George." Presidential candidate Howard Dean calls upon today's Sons of Liberty to overthrow a government that is "of, by and for the special interests."
When journalists don't credit their sources
Rafat Ali, editor of paidContent.org, makes a good point today that's worth underlining. Let him tell it:
It is amazing how major, respectable media companies like CNET News and AP don't know how to credit stories, especially stories done by small media/ trade sites. The Red Herring resurrection story was done by me on Sep 9, after a long, hard investigation. And they pick up the story, have no attributions, and never mentioned that I reported on it first. A very similar thing happened to me with the KeepMedia story: I did it on June 30, after another long investigation, and then the Wall Street Journal picks it up on July 21, writes this whole big story, and never credits me. I e-mailed the reporter, who said he never did know I did the story. I can understand that, but in this day and age of Google, any half-wit reporter would put some keywords in Google and find out if anyone else has done anything on it before. For instance, click on these Google keywords: "Red Herring Relaunch" and "KeepMedia". We call it research.Anyway, I find it strange then when other blogs write about the stories I have done, they ALWAYS credit me, but when traditional news orgs pick it up, they never do (except CBS Marketwatch!). Some who do, fail to ever link back to the site, the most basic, fundamental backbone of the Internet.
Please, take this is a public warning and a challenge: all you journalists who read my stories and don't credit, I will hunt you down and bring it to the court of public opinion. Enough of you guys milking the actual people who break the news. All I am asking is for a credit, like I do religiously when I pick up news from other sources. My whole raison d'Ítre is crediting other news sources.
Right on, Rafat! As a newsroom veteran, I've encountered this on far too many occasions. I made a similar point in a panel discussion on weblogs one year ago:
[With weblogs] you can see the origins of a story as it works its way through the media ecosystem, whereas in traditional journalism you're taught to slap a second-day lead on a story, and the reader doesn't get the context of how that story originated.
When I made that remark, Dan Gillmor leaned over and asked me, "Do you really think that happens a lot?" Yes, and as Rafat suggests, it's happening more often with bloggers.
Thanks to Steve Outing for the original pointer on this.
Mike Masnick said:
While I agree that news sources do steal stories and not credit people often enough, I think the two examples by Rafat don't really make sense. He runs a great site, and really turns up some amazing stuff - but if the reporter truly didn't find the story at his site then why should they credit him?
In the case of the Red Herring relaunch, the reason the story got picked up now is because they actually relaunched and went out and told the press about it. They know about it not because of Rafat's excellent research, but because the new Red Herring owners told them about it.
I'm all for more credit being given where it's due, but I don't think you should be forced to do a Google search and prove that no one (independently) came up with the same story.
the head lemur said:
J.D.
This should be a regular feature on journalism blogs. We have had this conversation before, not so much about credit, but about sources and linking to them. Because I am not a card carrying, press pass displaying, or byline holder, most of these comments will probably fall by the wayside by the selfsame 'professionals'. That's okay, been there, done that , have the t-shirt.
I don't know if it is J-Schools or institutional arrogance but most major media outlets do not source on the web. Minor media outlets seem to publish the scraps from the AP or Reuters news services as fillers between ads.
The guy above is making an ad hominen argument by virtue of since he didn't find it on one site but on another, the credit is not an issue?
I mean really how damn hard is it to provide a link to your source material? Yes, in the case where you link to the NYT, or the other news sites that are running a 7-14 day paywall game, it is problematic, but over time, it is to the detriment of those organizations and not the original poster.
I am not the lone ranger here when I say that the frequency of reading any site is in direct proportion to the quantity, and quality of links to establish credibility of a person's writings, reporting, opinion or raving lunacy.
Rafi is right when he says he can take his problems to the court of public opinion. There are a lot of us out here who will be more than happy to bitchslap folks who want to cut and paste.
Our media multitasking teens
Cory B. in Lost Remote points to this study about our very media multitasking teens. "More than 60 percent of teens say they regularly go online while watching TV." And I thought it was just me.
A copyright ethics quiz
From the Chicago Tribune comes this copyright ethics quiz. At 28 questions, it's too long, but it zooms in on some important questions facing society. Example:
You bought the vinyl LP years ago. Now you no longer have a turntable. Is it OK to download the album or burn a copy from a friend's CD without paying for it?
Fascinating stuff. Chicago Tribune blogger Eric Zorn, who devised the poll, has an accompanying column about digital rights and copyright, "an area of law with lots of wrinkles, few sharp boundaries and enormous gray areas." And Eric's blog points us to a sampling of national surveys on the subject.
I don't know how long the blog poll will be up so, ironically perhaps, I'm reposting the results to date below.
1. You hear or hear about a song that you think youíd like to have. Is it OK to download that song from a free file-sharing site on the web?
A. Yes, always (38%)
B. Yes, but only occasionally (20%)
C. No (42%)
2. You hear or hear about an entire album that you think youíd like to have. Is it OK to download that album from a free file- sharing site on the web?
A. Yes, always (22%)
B. Yes, but only occasionally (10%)
C. No (68%)
3. You hear or hear about a song that you think youíd like to have. Is it OK to burn a copy of that song from a CD that a good friend bought?
A. Yes, always (53%)
B. Yes, but only occasionally (17%)
C. No (30%)
4. You hear or hear about an album that you think youíd like to have. Is it OK to burn a copy of that album from a CD that a friend bought?
A. Yes, always (43%)
B. Yes, but only occasionally (16%)
C. No (42%)
5. You bought the vinyl LP years ago. Now you no longer have a turntable. Is it OK to download the album or burn a copy from a friend's CD without paying for it?
A. Yes, you paid for the music once and that's enough (75%)
B. No, you should pay again in order to have the music in a new format. (25%)
6. You bought the CD a year ago, but now itís lost or ruined. Is it OK to download the album or burn a copy from a friend's CD without paying for it?
A. Yes, you paid for the music once and that's enough (74%)
B. No, it's still stealing. (26%)
7. You love the CD you bought by the hot new pop star. Is it OK to burn a copy of the CD for your friends?
A. Yes, for 20 or more friends (15%)
B. Yes, but only for 10 to 20 friends (0%)
C. Yes, but only for fewer than 10 friends (4%)
D. Yes, but only for fewer than five friends (22%)
E. Yes, but only for just one friend (13%)
F. No. Friends should buy their own copy of the music and support the artist (45%)
8. You love the CD you bought by the local struggling musician Is it OK to burn a copy of the CD for your friends?
A. Yes, for 20 or more friends (14%)
B. Yes, but only for 10 to 20 friends (1%)
C. Yes, but only for fewer than 10 friends (3%)
D. Yes, but only for fewer than five friends (14%)
E. Yes, but only for one friend (11%)
F. No. Friends should buy their own copy of the music and support the struggling artist (58%)
9. A friend tells you she loves the new CD she bought by the hot new pop star, and offers you a pirated copy. Is it OK to take it?
A. Yes, always (33%)
B. Yes, every so often, as long as you don't make a habit of it. (11%)
C. Yes, but only if it inspires you later to buy a different album by that same artist (4%)
D. Yes, but only on the condition that if you like it, you'll buy the album later (8%)
E. No. You should ask to borrow the original so you can try before buying (28%)
F. No. You should write down the title and artist name and buy the album yourself (16%)
10. A friend tells you she loves the new CD by the local struggling musician and offers you a pirated copy? Is it OK to take it?
A. Yes, always (24%)
B. Yes, every so often, as long as you don't make a habit of it. (8%)
C. Yes, but only if it inspires you later to buy a different album by that same artist (5%)
D. Yes, but only on the condition that if you like it, you'll buy the album later (11%)
E. No. You should ask to borrow the original so you can try before buying (33%)
F. No. You should write down the title and artist name and buy the album yourself (18%)
11. Is it OK to use your VCR to create videotape library of episodes of your favorite TV programs for your personal use, even though the studios sell such libraries?
A. Yes (93%)
B. No (7%)
12. Is it OK to use your VCR to create videotape library of episodes of your favorite TV programs and then lend or give those tapes to friends?
A. Yes, to 20 or more friends (40%)
B. Yes, but only to 10 - 20 friends (1%)
C. Yes, but as long as it's to fewer than 10 friends (5%)
D. Yes, but as long as it's to fewer than five friends (18%)
E. Yes, but as long as it's for just to one friend (13%)
F. No. (24%)
13. Does it make any difference, above, if the program was on free TV as opposed to on a subscription service, such as HBO, to which your friend does not subscribe?
A. No, the principle is the same and it's always OK (54%)
B. No, the principle is the same and it's sometimes OK, depending on the number of friends involved (15%)
C. Yes: HBO is OK, but people should make their own free-TV program anthologies (3%)
D. Yes: Free TV is OK, but no one should be allowed to freeload off HBO or the like. (8%)
E. No, it's never OK (19%)
14. You read a fabulous column in the newspaper. Is it OK to make photocopies and pass or mail them around to friends and neighbors?
A. Yes, for 20 or more copies (54%)
B. Yes, but only for 10 to 20 copies. (3%)
C. Yes, but only for fewer than 10 copies (6%)
D. Yes, but only for fewer than five copies (15%)
E. Yes, but only one copy (6%)
F. No. (17%)
15. You read a fabulous work of short fiction in a published anthology Is it OK to make several dozen photocopies and pass or mail them around?
A. Yes, for 20 or more copies (27%)
B. Yes, but only for 10 to 20 copies. (2%)
C. Yes, but only for fewer than 10 copies (5%)
D. Yes, but only for fewer than five copies (11%)
E. Yes, but only one copy (6%)
F. No. (49%)
16. Does it make any difference, in the above question, if the work of fiction is novel-length?
A. No, it's still OK (34%)
B. Yes, copying a novel is wrong, but copying a short story is OK (16%)
C. No, it's still wrong (50%)
17. Does it make any difference, when it comes to copying material that's still under copyright, whether it's out of print or otherwise difficult if not impossible to purchase?
A. No, it's OK no matter what (29%)
B. Yes. If you can't buy it, it's OK to copy it. (45%)
C. No, it's still wrong (27%)
18. You read a compelling article on a magazineís website. Is it OK to copy the text electronically and paste it into e-mail to friends?
A. Yes, to 20 or more friends (49%)
B. Yes, but only to 10 - 20 friends (2%)
C. Yes, but only to fewer than 10 friends (4%)
D. Yes, but only to fewer than five friends (9%)
E. Yes, but only to one friend (4%)
F. No. Websites depend on visitors for revenue. Send your friends the address of the site. (32%)
19. You read a compelling article on a magazineís website. Is it OK to cut and paste the text electronically and post it to an online message board?
A. Yes (28%)
B. No. You can summarize and post brief excerpts, but you should post the web address, not the article (72%)
20. In the above examples, does it make a difference if the website is free to all or available only to paid subscribers?
A. No. Information wants to be free. Send it around. Post it at will. (31%)
B. Yes. If the site is free, send the URL. If it's paid-access, send the text. (20%)
C. Yes. If the site is paid-access, don't try to send the article around. (21%)
D. No, it's always wrong. (28%)
21. Is it OK for the owner of a business to play a music radio station over the intercom to provide background entertainment for employees and customers?
A. Yes, always (71%)
B. Yes, but only if it's a small business. (10%)
C. No, not without paying royalties to the musicians' unions. (19%)
22. You rent a movie from the video palace. Is it OK to show it at a meeting of your club?
A. Yes, always (63%)
B. Yes, but only if the club has 25 or fewer members. (5%)
C. Yes, but only if the club has 10 or fewer members (6%)
D. No. The video is rented for home viewing only, not for showing at a club, no matter how small. (26%)
23. You rent a movie from the video palace and must return it before you can watch it. Is it OK to dub a copy to watch later at your convenience?
A. Yes, you paid for it. (35%)
B. Yes, but only if you erase the copy of the movie after you view it. (17%)
C. No. (48%)
24. You check out a movie from the library and must return it before you can watch it. Is it OK to dub a copy to watch at your convenience?
A. Yes, always (38%)
B. Yes, but only if you erase the copy of the movie after you view it. (16%)
C. No. (46%)
25. A friend offers you a copy of a bootleg recording made at a concert with the permission of the band. Is it OK to take it?
A. Yes. The recording isn't for sale anyway, and it will improve your relationship with the artist. (45%)
B. Yes if he wants to give it to you. No if he wants to sell it to you. (39%)
C. No. Such recordings deprive artists of a market for their own, sanctioned live recordings. (16%)
26. Has the recent publicity about music piracy, file-sharing and so on changed your views about what is and isn't "fair use" of copyrighted material?
A. No, I remain aggressively opposed to attempts to limit my ability to acquire and disseminate material at will. (32%)
B. Yes. Although I'll continue to dabble in everyday copyright violations, I will be thinking twice as I do. (23%)
C. Yes, I'm cutting way back and being much more careful because, hey, it's only right. (11%)
D. Yes, I'm cutting way back and being much more careful because, hey, I might get sued. (9%)
E. Yes, I'm going to be as scrupulous as possible from now on. (14%)
F. Yes, I'm going to be as scrupulous as possible from now on and I plan to destroy all illicit copies in my possession.. (4%)
G. No, I followed the copyright laws before and I'm following them now (6%)
27. How do your feelings about the business / industry behind the artist influence your decision about whether or not to pay for the use of copyrighted material?
A. Not at all. I use what I want and try never to pay. (11%)
B. If an industry has been ripping off the consumer and the artist for years, I'm more likely to try not to pay. (50%)
C. Not at all. Stealing is stealing. Two wrongs don't make a right. (39%)
28. When it comes to everyday copyright dilemmas such as these, how do your beliefs ñ the dictates of your Better Self ñ square with your actual behavior?
A. They are in sync. I take what I can and I believe it's OK (19%)
B. They are not in sync. I believe I should be violating copyright more often than I do (11%)
C. They are not in sync. I violate copyright more than I should. My Better Self reproves me. (38%)
D. They are in sync. I respect copyright and make every effort never to violate it. (32%)
Lieberman peaks 14 months too soon
In NY Post doings ...
The latest Marist College poll in New York state shows that Sen. Joseph Lieberman is 10 points ahead of his nearest rival, Howard Dean. Which shows how tuned out New Yorkers are to the national election this early.
I'll wager that by the time the New York primary rolls around, Liberman will not only lose, he won't even be in the race. Any takers?
Meantime, a Post editorial today blasts the New York Times for blasting the Times for underplaying coverage of this week's Gallup poll showing most Iraqis think they're better off now than under Saddam. (The editorial isn't online yet.) Sorry, guys, you're missing the point. No one suggests that the Iraqis aren't better off today. But are we?
Google News creator reflects on success
Staci Kramer's latest in OJR: Google News Creator Watches Portal Quiet Critics With 'Best News' Webby. A year after its launch, the computer-generated aggregator is still taking flak for how it defines news. But Krishna Bharat has had the satisfaction of seeing growing acceptance of his news site. In a Q&A with OJR, he explains how things work behind the screens, and why he calls the site "a force for democracy."
Toward a weblogging empire
Wired News follows the story of Jason Calacanis, who is resurfacing as the would-be czar of a weblogging clearinghouse.
I hope Jason succeeds. As even he admits, it's an uphill climb. Nick Denton, creator of Gawker and Gizmodo, offers a reality check:
Denton ... fired back on his own site, "Jason Calacanis, founder of Silicon Alley Reporter and boom time hype-merchant, has re-emerged as a blog booster. God help us.... Calacanis is a smart and engaging guy, and I'm a believer in Web media, but the last thing the world needs now is his brand of late '90s enthusiasm. Here's a reality check: Gawker and Gizmodo do about $2,000 each in ad revenue a month. Roughly the earnings of a starving freelance writer."
Meantime, Tony Perkins of Red Herring and AlwaysOn fame pens a column today that might be better titled The Blogging Education of Tony Perkins. I've given in and added AlwaysOn to the blogroll at the right.
A wireless iPod can torpedo the pirates
Business Week Online: A Wireless iPod Can Torpedo the Pirates. If Apple produced the technology and Big Music revamped its business plan, today's file-swappers would be sunk in no time. (I'm linking to the printer page because the story page isn't rendering properly.)
For more vigilant coverage of the '04 election
From MediaChannel.org: Blogger Danny Schechter, author of the book Embedded: Weapons of Mass Deception: How the media failed to cover the war on Iraq, has a take on news media coverage of the 2004 election. Excerpt:
Variety reports that "Everyone on the Bus" will be the motto of ABC News during the coming presidential election as network executives recently introduced their plans for covering the campaign. The network introduced several new wrinkles in its 2004 coverage at a news conference: three high-tech-laden buses, described by executives as "mobile bureaus and mobile studios" that are designed to give reporters more flexibility in filing stories on the road; partnerships with two media outlets that reach school-age children; and expanded Internet coverage.The problem is that once again more attention is being paid to technology and cosmetics than to content and analysis. ...
We need more than news buses on the campaign trail. We need a more vigilant media and media companies willing to allocate time and intellectual capital to improving coverage.
Dead on.
Dean camp looking for code jockeys
The Howard Dean campaign is looking for a few good Linux jockeys to work on their websites, says Doc Searls.
Studios try to thwart movie piracy
From today's NY Times: Studios Moving to Block Piracy of Films Online.
Lots of discussion about educating students, but precious little discussion of new digital delivery systems for the motion picture industry.
And John Schwartz follows up on the 66-year-old sculptor and and retired schoolteacher whom the RIAA originally accused of being a music pirate. She Says She's No Music Pirate. No Snoop Fan, Either.
September 24, 2003
WhoWillBeatBush.com
From Mitch Ratcliffe:
Seth Godin has launched WhoWillBeatBush.com, a way of wagering on the election that lets the person who correctly picks the winning Democratic candidate and the margin of victory (presumably in popular votes -- do they mean electoral votes, which have counted more in previous Bush elections?) Each entrant earns one cent toward a pot that will be awarded to the charity of the winner's choice. I like this idea, because it gives you just one more reason to go and vote -- sometimes just being able to hope you'll win the opportunity to give a large amount of money to a charity is enough for the liberal voter to get off his or her rump and go to the poll.
Jason Calacanis launches Weblogs, Inc.
From BoingBoing:
Jason Calacanis, founder of Silicon Alley Reporter and Venture Reporter magazines, launched his new venture this morning. Weblogs, Inc. is sort of a profit-based micropublishing system for niche, business-to-business blogs. Here's a snip from the company's manifesto.Weblogs, Inc. is a B2B Web site dedicated to creating niche Weblogs (a.k.a. blogs) across niche industries in which user participation is an essential component of the resulting product. Weblogs, Inc. is creating a new layer on top of the traditional business-to-business media that:
* saves professionals the time associated with reading dozens of B2B publications by providing a non-stop, top-level summary of the news;
* provides analytical tools that allow users the ability to sort and search stories by subtopics inside B2B niches;
* gives users the ability to participate by engaging in discussions, ranking stories and by submitting their own ìblogsî (i.e., pointers and summaries of stories on other sites); and
* promotes fairness and truth in reporting by acting as a public forum where industry professionals can participate.
This from the Weblogs, Inc. site:
Traditional journalism is, in a word, broken. We've spent the last decade working in publishing (online and offline) and we believe that traditional journalism is imploding.
Interesting, and something to watch, perchance to participate in.
Watching the California debate
Watched the California recall debate tonight, which took place five minutes from where I used to live for 17 years in Sacramento. We'll see how the mainstream media plays this tomorrow, but quick first impressions:
Arnold came off as blustery and a little bit scary. He bullied Arianna Huffington and Cruz Bustamante by talking over them, interrupting, insisting on getting the last word. He wasn't out of his depth, but he kept coming back to general platitudes without specific solutions. Oddball comment of the evening: "We should model ourselves after Texas," Arnold said, talking about the state's infrastructure.
Cruz came off as a bit too arrogant, talking down to Arianna and Arnold as if they didn't know the intricacies of state government. He pulled a Gore on a couple of occasions, visibly flustered at the nattering nabobs on the panel.
Tom McClintock seemed assured and didn't back down from his conservative positions even when he was a minority of one on some issues, such as in his criticism of illegal immigrants. I didn't see anything to suggest he's thinking of dropping out.
Arianna was a wildcat, attacking Cruz on occasion but mostly taking aim at Arnold. At one point, when he repeatedly interrupted her, she shot back, ìThis is the way you treat women ..."
Peter Camejo was impressive if a bit too professorial and impractical. He raised issues that nobody else touched, about civil liberties and reformng the tax system.
The moderator must have been on drugs, calling Arianna "Governor Schwarzenegger" at one point.
All in all, nobody made any fatal mistakes. The debate once again reinforced my deepfelt belief that the electoral system is out of whack at both the national and statewide level. I wish someone would finance a proposition that reformed the system of elections so that we could vote for the candidate we really support (Arianna) rather than being forced to vote for one of the front-runners because there's no runoff election. (The Green Party supports this.) Isn't representative government about voting for the candidate you favor the most?
The winning candidate tonight just may have been Gray Davis, with all these suits taking potshots at one another. The latest tracking polls indicate that he's closing the gap. I'm no fan of Davis, but don't be surprised if he narrowly beats the recall in 13 days.
Here's the Sac Bee's Daniel Weintraub's take: No clear winner.
National Free WiFi Day
Thursday is National Free WiFi Day. (Intel, which coaxed T-Mobile, Wayport, Boingo, iPass and others that normally charge $30 a month or more for access into making all their hotspots free for a day, is calling it One Unwired Day.) The San Jose Merc has the story.
Gannett's missing archives
Remember the U.S. Supreme Court's Tasini v. New York Times ruling, which required newspaper publishers to negotiate archiving rights with free-lancers or purge their databases of unlicensed freelance material? The ruling came down June 25, 2001.
I just learned today that a number of Gannett newspapers have had their archives down for more than two years now. The kicker is they are not being allowed to filter out the infringing material so that the archives could go live again, thanks to orders from Gannett corporate. So at the estimable AZCentral, for example, all stories disappear into the ether after two weeks.
This is what happens when lawyers run your company.
Uncle Bob said:
And this is what happens when a handful of corporations are allowed to take over virtually all of the country's newspapers. It's another sign (as if we hadn't figured it out already, duh) that the big corporate chain owners don't give a damn about the communities they "serve."
However, if Michael Powell has his way over at the FCC, I'm sure it'll all get a *lot* better.
Not.
Drudge hijacked?
Wot the heck? I just typed in www.drudgereport.com and was transferred to Web Money Transfer. Was Drudge hijacked? Or is this a new revenue stream for him?
Will California's anti-spam law work?
Will California's new anti-spam law work? I doubt it (of the hundreds of spam messages I get today, none come with the required "ADV" in the Subject line), but perhaps a small step is better than none.
Debate times two
Californians can tune in to local channels today at 6 pm to watch the candidates in the recall election debate. I'll TiVo it just to see how Arnold comes off, since this will be his only debate appearance.
Thursday on MSNBC-TV at 6 pm (I believe it's live on the East Coast and tape-delayed here in the West) is the next Democratic candidates debate, with the new front-runner, Wesley Clark.
RSS entrepreneurs offer online publishing alternatives
Steve Outing's latest in E&P: Startups Offer Online Publishing Alternatives. It's a fascinating look at a half-dozen RSS entrepreneurs, most of whom I'd never heard of. Excerpt:
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada-based Toolbutton Inc. is run by Dale Janssen, who hails from the technical-education industry -- where he published several hundred e-mail newsletters and says his previous company sent out about 20 million opt-in e-mails a month. "About a year ago," he says, "I saw the inevitable decline of e-mail as a content-delivery method on the Internet. So I set out to find a replacement -- and as the story normally goes -- I did not find anything, so I built it."Janssen liked what he saw with RSS, and he's especially enthusiastic about the RSS 2.0 specification, which adds some capabilities that support more sophisticated publishing. He points out that RSS 2.0 supports adding attachments to feeds. So, future RSS feeds could include audio or video clips and they can deliver actual content to subscribers, rather than simple text links to it, as is now the most common practice.
Geek eye for the Luddite guys
Fortune magazine (and gotta love this headline): Geek eye for the Luddite guys. Can three tech experts deliver digital happiness to a small part of America? Fortune footed the bill to install practical, easy to use products in the home of the most typically tech-less family we could find in an attempt to create digital nirvana.
Outrage of the Day
Reuters: A federal court in Oklahoma City has blocked the national "do not call" list that would have allowed consumers to stop most unwanted telephone sales, one week before the much-anticipated measure was due to take effect. Some 50 million people had already signed up (including me).
Search by location with Google
Gary Price and Sheila both point us to a new Google capability: Search by location. Says Sheila: "You're looking for nearby sashimi in a strange city, or you can't remember the name of the pizza joint a few blocks away. Here, you can restrict your search to a geographic area (a city or a zip code), and Google will deliver a map with your results marked on it."
Gary points out, "Google that gets all of the press for being so innovative. Unfortunately many people have forgotten that other tools are still vital, useful, and also doing innovative things."
kpaul said:
People laugh at me when I say it, but I think Google is gearing up to be serious competition for newspapers in the online space...
'An edited blog is a contradiction in terms'
Tim Rutten of the LA Times jumps into the controversy over the Sacramento Bee putting the editing clamps on Daniel Weintraub's blog. (See the past two days for prior entries on the subject.) I disagree with most of Rutten's conclusions, but he ends the piece nicely with this:
"An edited blog is a contradiction in terms," said Orville Schell, dean of UC Berkeley's Graduate School of Journalism. "It's a characteristic of the Internet in general that forms like the blog emerge with great exuberance and edgy promise and then the overseers move in. That's a pity. We need frontiers of plain-speaking, even it's politically incorrect. I understand why the Bee did what it did, but it leads to a restraint on free-thinking, which is lamentable."
I suspect Schell wouldn't have a problem with the kind of Editing Lite for blogs that I proposed in February.
Sheila Lennon, one of the best newspaper bloggers in the land, has more on this here and here.
Flashback to the birth of a father
My niece Gina, who just had her first baby, Elisabeth, emails to tell me she is receiving the weekly BabyCenter email newsletter (which I highly recommend to new parents). She added, "Hey, look at the bottom of the newsletter, it's got your series on Bobby."
And indeed it did. Bobby is 4 years old now and, for the moment, no longer a major media star.
Governor Groper?
Katha Pollit in The Nation offers this salient point about revelations concerning Arnold Schwarzenegger's past:
Now just imagine for a moment that a Democratic politician had told a soft-core men's magazine in 1977 about gangbanging a "black girl"--and when asked about it in 2003 said he didn't remember a thing about the interview or the incident itself, but also said he made the whole thing up to get attention. Would that story have been relegated to the bin of youthful escapades by Fox, CNN, the New York Post, Peggy Noonan, Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly and the rest? Or would we be hearing a lot about "character" and the "I was lying" defense? ...
Absolutely. The point is not that Arnold's indiscretions should disqualify him -- they shouldn't -- but that there's a terrible double standard at work in the land.
Whoopsie! RIAA withdraws suit
Gosh, looks like the recording industry wasn't all that careful when it picked out some of its initial legal targets. Turns out, the Boston Globe reports, that one of its targets wasn't a file-trader at all. And now they've withdrawn their suit.
Mary has more at bIPlog.
Ombudsmen take an undeserved bashing
Matt Welch couldn't be more wrong in his latest in Reason Online: Anything but the Ombudsman! Why newspapers should avoid in-house watchdogs.
It's the paucity of ombudsman at U.S. newspapers (something like 40 out of 1,700 daily papers) that make contrarians like Welch take potshots at one of the few institutions that can help restore reader trust in newspapers. Ombudsmen do what no other editorial position can do: shine a light into the editorial process, expose slip-ups, and bring transparency to the labyrinthine newsrooms of America. Too bad Matt hasn't ever been exposed to one.
Should newspapers edit their blogs?
New in OJR: Should newspapers edit their blogs? Mark Glaser ponders the Sacramento Bee's decision to bring blogger Daniel Weintraub's California Insider into the fold.
Meantime, Mickey Kaus follows up on the muzzling of the Bee's political blogger with an update and this conclusion about "the Bee's best defense--in effect, 'We didn't let the Latino caucus muzzle Weintraub because we muzzled him first!' "
I'd concede that pre-publication editing often improves pieces--depends on the editor--but not enough to justify what is lost on the Web (where you can always do post-publication fiddling if necessary).
Again, I'm with Kaus on this one. And also with him that bloggers shouldn't take it out on the new Bee editorial crew blog. I know some of those folks (three out of six are past colleagues), and they're good people.
Meantime, Glenn Reynolds over at Instapundit chimes in on l'affaire Bee, with an interview in OJR and his own posting. Sayeth Glenn:
what I like about a Movable Type-powered blog like this one is that you can produce a post like this, bit by bit, over an hour or so as new stuff happens. I don't think you could do that with an editor involved, and certainly not if you had to email in each incremental addition. Especially after the editor has left for the day.
Agree there. And Jeff Jarvis, natch, has his say. Says Jeff (and, again, I agree):
News organizations have to start looking at information in new ways. I started making this point the other day when I suggested that just for a moment, we should drop the term "news" with all its heavy baggage and instead look on our job in terms of imparting information. (That same day, I had a long lunch on this topic with Jay Rosen, chair of NYU's journalism school and a blogger himself; he gets it.) When you do that, when you see yourself as a leader in the information business, then minders and copy editors become just a little less important. The value of information to the audience becomes more important. ... even more than being in the news business, we are in the information business.
And, finally, Ryan Pitts has a lot more here.
September 23, 2003
A free blog traffic analyzer
From the Shifted Librarian comes word of a new service, Lumberjack, that analyzes your blog traffic -- for free. (Do you really want to know?)
Dirty secrets
Mother Jones: Dirty Secrets. No president has gone after the nation's environmental laws with the same fury as George W. Bush -- and none has been so adept at staying under the radar.
A new Dem blog, but where's the Bush countdown?
The Democratic National Committee has a new blog: Kicking Ass.
Here's an idea (and I'm surprised I haven't seen this on any site yet): A java countdown ticker to the days, hours and minutes remaining in George W. Bush's administration, which is due to end at noon on Jan. 20, 2005.
Update: Just came across this Bush Countdown Clock via the Drudge Retort.
Maher: 'File sharing is theft'
Just caught Bill Maher on TiVo from his HBO Real Time show last. I found it astounding to see Maher go off on a 10-minute rant against file trading (complete with a remote feed from Liz Phair, with no one taking a contrary POV). "It's very simple: The technology allows you to steal. ... Sampling is theft." He then held up a half-dozen shitty albums from the '60s that contained only a single good song. His point, I guess, is that today's kids should suffer just as he did.
Roger Benningfield said:
J.D.: I was pretty astounded by that, myself. But I shouldn't be surprised... Bill seems to prefer to keep himself heavily insulated from technology. You'll seldom see him mention tech of any kind unless he's got a "see how crappy things are getting?" angle on the issue. As I mentioned in a blog entry from earlier this year (see link), he's pretty locked into his hip-swinger-from-1976 persona.
JD said:
Best line of the night (though unintentional) belonged to the clueless Jesse Ventura, who responded to one of Maher's rants with a question: "What's a shiksa?" Replied Maher: "Boy, you are from Minnesota."
Maher penned a short piece for Salon last week: Barbie is a shiksa!
Can progressives love Wesley Clark?
The brilliant Sydney H. Schanberg in The Village Voice: Gen. Clark's changing tune on Iraq. He wobbled and weaved as his candidacy neared.
And related story: Can Progressives Love a Military Man?
From the New Republic: Why isn't Joe Trippi sweating Clark?
Plus, from last week's Slate: The Agenda of Wesley Clark. What he'd do as president.
From Monday's Slate: Wesley Clark's Patriot Act. The general unveils his campaign message in South Carolina.
And this: President Hillary -- a conservative fantasy exposed.
Finally, Wednesday's NY Times has this: Dean Takes the Offensive in Comments on Clark.
I doubt we'll see Dr. Dean go after Clark too harshly. He'll need him on the ticket in 14 months.
andy said:
Two quickies:
Sometime ago on this blog denials about Dean's unbearable disposition flew like feathers off a chicken. Well, in today's ABC News "The Note," observations re Dean's awful disposition --almost discomforting to the TV viewer!-- have been confirmed: "...Clark, like Dean, is said to have an anger management problem, and apparently needs more basic training on keeping his cool during hostile interviews."
How about during the debates. Phew!
Second, with all the talk of Democrats supporting Clark, along comes a few good 'ole YRs (Young Republicans) motivated, highly interested and energized to support Wes Clark for POTUS in '04. See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/yrs4clark/
Yupe, it's true. See for yourself.
Smiling George on $200 bill
Just came across this on the Smoking Gun: North Carolina cops are searching for a guy who successfully passed a $200 bill bearing George W. Bush's portrait and a drawing of the White House.
What is long distance?
John Patrick, president of Attitude LLC and former vice president of Internet technology at IBM, ordered his Packet8 VoIP system last week and got it Friday. What is long distance, anyway? he asks.
Animated Arianna
Yesterday I reported on the Match Your Candidate Game, created by the web gang at Arianna Huffington HQ.
Now comes another fun and edgy Internet film short, the Special Interest Brothel, set in a cathouse for fat cats.
Meantime, I had missed this earlier animated short, Hybrid vs. Hummer.
It's amazing what creative minds can do when they're not inhibited by front-runner status.
Jury convicts man in DMCA case
CNET News.com:
A federal jury has convicted a Florida man of violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, in the first jury-trial conviction under the controversial law, according to a U.S. attorney's office.The Los Angeles jury found 38-year-old Thomas Michael Whitehead guilty on Friday of selling hardware that could access DirecTV satellite broadcasts without paying for them, according to the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles.
I'm afraid I don't have much sympathy for people who pirate cable or satellite TV. On the other hand, surely this was illegal before the DMCA?
Romenesko, MIA
Why is Jim Romenesko -- by far the best thing about Poynter Online -- not even mentioned on the Poynter Online home page?
Julie said:
Actually, he is -- the top column on the right rail. Like many others, you probably skipped right over it due to the flashing images just above it that (inaccurately in this case) scream out 'ADS - DON'T BOTHER READING' ;)
Can newspapers handle blogs?
Doc Searls weighs in on the Sacramento Bee's bloggergate. Says Doc: "My belief is that [small media] will be the first to learn how to use blogs, and bloggers, as symbiotic sources of both news production and editing services."
Times crossword gets beefed up
Perhaps taking a page from the videogame industry's multiplayer games playbook, the NYTimes.com today announced three new features on its Premium Crosswords that enable members to play collaboratively or competitively, solo or in groups. The new features, ìPlay Against the Clock,î ìPlay With a Friendî and ìChallenge Matches,î are available to Premium Crosswords subscribers only, for an annual subscription fee of $34.95 or a monthly fee of $5.95.
If you're a crossword puzzle nut, that's good news.
Americans now split on Iraq war
Gallup reports today: Americans Grow More Doubtful About Iraq War. According to a key Gallup indicator of Americans' support for the Iraq war, public agreement that the Iraq situation was "worth going to war over" has declined 8 points in less than two weeks, and declined 13 points since late August. As a result, Americans are now evenly divided on this question.
This comes on the heels of yesterday's Gallup finding that showed Gen. Wesley Clark leading President Bush 49-46 percent in a head-to-head matchup, with Howard Dean trailing Bush slightly. (The Gallup site offers only a video version of their findings.) This, despite the fact that most people still can't name a Democratic candidate.
Meantime, Josh Marshall reports that the White House-engineered mudslinging campaign against Clark (led by -- surprise! -- Fox News) has begun in earnest.
 |
And, living down to expectations, Newsweek's Howard Fineman pens a campaign trail update with this headline: Howard who? When he announced his candidacy, Wesley Clark became the Democrats' new It Boy.
Dick Morris, the execrable Clinton castoff and back-stabber, has a column in the NY Post today suggesting the Clark will fade down the stretch: "The Dean candidacy is the first creation of the Internet age. By contrast, Clarkís is perhaps the last of the media-created candidacies."
By the way, last night my site and blog went down for the fourth time this year. Dreamhost (Nightmarehost?) came back with the message: Site unavailable. error id: "bad_httpd_conf" -- whatever that means. If it happens again, I'm switching hosts.
FBI seeking reporters' notes
Wired News: The FBI says it will soon demand reporters' notes in its attempts to nail the so-called Homeless Hacker, Adrian Lamo.
A bad idea. As the article points out, "According to the Justice Department's policy standards, subpoenas for reporters' notes can be issued only if 'the information sought is essential to a successful investigation -- particularly with reference to directly establishing guilt or innocence' and after the government has 'unsuccessfully attempted to obtain the information from alternative non-media sources.' "
File traders get kick out of soccer flick
Among the top 10 movies downloaded on the Internet in August were the usual blockbusters: Pirates of the Caribbean, The Hulk, Matrix Reloaded ... and Shaolin Soccer.A comedy about a group of Shaolin monks who blend their kung fu skills with soccer is a smash hit with file sharers (watch the trailer). ...
Fans of the Kung Fu genre have been waiting for Shaolin Soccer for months. Miramax has postponed its release date at least three times. Originally released in Cantonese with English subtitles, the film was dubbed into English for U.S. audiences. Now, the studio intends to release the movie in the original form with English subtitles instead.
A Miramax spokesman said that the company is looking for the right time to release the film to give it the best chance of success in the market. There's no set release date at the moment.